Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon HD 4810
When comparing Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon HD 4810, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon HD 4810 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 4810
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4810 has 533% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4810 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4810 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | TeraScale |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | RV770 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 28 May 2009 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |