Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon R9 370
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon R9 370, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Graphics 6100 stacks up against Radeon R9 370, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 370
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 633% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 625 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 571% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 363% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 563% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3 | Trinidad |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 January 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 975 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |