Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon R9 M270X
When comparing Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon R9 M270X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon R9 M270X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M270X
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Fortnite is 22% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3 | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 January 2015 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon R6 M340DX
- Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon R9 M365X
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R6 M340DX
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R9 M365X
- Iris Graphics 6100 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370