Iris Graphics 6100 vs Tesla M10
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Graphics 6100 and Tesla M10, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Graphics 6100 stacks up against Tesla M10, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M10
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 733 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 127% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 242% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 208% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 227% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |