FirePro M6000 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
When comparing FirePro M6000 and Iris Plus Graphics 640, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M6000 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M6000 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M6000 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 or Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Power consumption (TDP)
43 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M6000 has 186% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 30 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 450 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
FirePro M6000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
6−7
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
16−18
medium / 1080p
10−12
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M6000 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
130−140
medium / 768p
120−130
110−120
ultra / 1080p
65−70
50−55
QHD / 1440p
35−40
27−30
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
95−100
80−85
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
85−90
80−85
medium / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
10−11
8−9
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
4K / 2160p
4−5
3−4
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−12
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−33
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Fortnite is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
QHD / 1440p
3−4
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
60−65
50−55
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
12−14
medium / 1080p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
95−100
90−95
ultra / 1080p
85−90
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
12−14
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
30−35
24−27
medium / 768p
21−24
16−18
high / 1080p
10−12
9−10
ultra / 1080p
7−8
6−7
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Full Specs
FirePro M6000
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Architecture
GCN
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
Heathrow
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 July 2012
3 January 2017
Pipelines
640
48
Core clock speed
750 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
32.00
52.80
Floating-point performance
1,024 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.103
Bus support
n/a
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
MXM-B
StereoOutput3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
