FirePro S7000 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7000 and Iris Plus Graphics 640, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7000 stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 640, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 2233% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 650 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 188% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 180% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 102% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 222% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 140% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 169% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | Pitcairn | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R9 270
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M