FirePro V5900 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
When comparing FirePro V5900 and Iris Plus Graphics 640, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V5900 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5900
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V5900 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 30 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro V5900 is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
6−7
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
16−18
medium / 1080p
7−8
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
130−140
130−140
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
24−27
27−30
4K / 2160p
12−14
27−30
high / 768p
75−80
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
80−85
80−85
medium / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
30−35
FirePro V5900 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
4K / 2160p
5−6
3−4
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
7−8
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
7−8
14−16
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 17% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
medium / 768p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
3−4
4−5
ultra / 1080p
1−2
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
12−14
medium / 1080p
4−5
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 3% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than FirePro V5900.
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
12−14
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
20−22
24−27
medium / 768p
12−14
16−18
high / 1080p
6−7
9−10
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
medium / 768p
40−45
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
18−20
high / 768p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FirePro V5900.
Full Specs
FirePro V5900
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
Cayman
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
24 May 2011
3 January 2017
Pipelines
512
48
Core clock speed
600 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
52.80
Floating-point performance
614.4 gflops
Length
230 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
