FirePro W4300 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
When comparing FirePro W4300 and Iris Plus Graphics 640, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4300 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4300
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W4300 has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 630 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
FirePro W4300 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
18−20
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
20−22
10−11
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
24−27
medium / 1080p
24−27
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Battlefield 5 is 106% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W4300 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
130−140
medium / 768p
170−180
110−120
ultra / 1080p
95−100
50−55
QHD / 1440p
50−55
27−30
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
140−150
80−85
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
110−120
80−85
medium / 768p
90−95
55−60
ultra / 1080p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 57% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
16−18
8−9
ultra / 1080p
16−18
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
3−4
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Far Cry 5 is 111% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
10−11
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
95−100
60−65
medium / 1080p
50−55
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 77% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
20−22
10−12
QHD / 1440p
9−10
1−2
low / 720p
50−55
24−27
medium / 1080p
27−30
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
85−90
50−55
medium / 768p
75−80
45−50
high / 1080p
27−30
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
6−7
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
9−10
4−5
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
12−14
medium / 1080p
12−14
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
110−120
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
100−110
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−110
90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
12−14
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
50−55
24−27
medium / 768p
30−35
16−18
high / 1080p
18−20
9−10
ultra / 1080p
10−12
6−7
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 84% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
35−40
18−20
high / 768p
50−55
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Full Specs
FirePro W4300
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
Bonaire
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 December 2015
3 January 2017
Pipelines
768
48
Core clock speed
930 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
2,080 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
44.64
52.80
Floating-point performance
1,428 gflops
Length
171 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.3
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.103
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
152 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
