FireStream 9270 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
When comparing FireStream 9270 and Iris Plus Graphics 640, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 966% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 30 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 450 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
FireStream 9270 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 17% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 3% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | RV770 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 930MX
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro V5900
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce 930MX
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs FirePro V5900
- FireStream 9270 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M