GeForce 825M vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics 640. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics 640. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GeForce 825M Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics 640 Check Price

GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics 640 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics 640 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M or Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:

GeForce 825M Laptops

Iris Plus Graphics 640 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce 825M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	32 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce 825M has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 30 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	2−3	16−18
medium / 1080p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 750% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	35−40	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	55−60	130−140
medium / 768p	30−33	110−120
ultra / 1080p	6−7	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	18−20	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	55−60	80−85
medium / 768p	14−16	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	−	8−9
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 181% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	0−1	14−16
low / 768p	18−20	50−55
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	4−5
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	6−7
low / 768p	80−85	95−100
high / 1080p	60−65	90−95
ultra / 1080p	50−55	80−85
medium / 1080p	75−80	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 33% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	10−11	30−35
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 150% more, than GeForce 825M.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	0−1	24−27
medium / 768p	−	16−18
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	16−18	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
high / 768p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce 825M.

Full Specs

	GeForce 825M	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name	GK208	Kaby Lake GT3e
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	27 January 2014	3 January 2017
Pipelines	384	48
Core clock speed	850 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock	941 MHz	1050 MHz
Transistor count	915 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	30.11	52.80
Floating-point performance	722.7 gflops
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	+
Laptop size	medium sized
Optimus	+
Quick Sync		+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce 825M vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics 640 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares