GeForce GTX 465 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Iris Plus Graphics 640, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 465 stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 640, check out specs charts below.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 1233% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 31 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 915 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
16−18
medium / 1080p
18−20
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
21−24
12−14
ultra / 1080p
20−22
10−11
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
24−27
medium / 1080p
24−27
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 465 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
130−140
medium / 768p
170−180
110−120
ultra / 1080p
95−100
50−55
QHD / 1440p
50−55
27−30
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
130−140
80−85
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
100−110
80−85
medium / 768p
90−95
55−60
ultra / 1080p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
16−18
8−9
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
3−4
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 111% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
10−11
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
95−100
60−65
medium / 1080p
50−55
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 77% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
18−20
10−12
QHD / 1440p
8−9
1−2
low / 720p
50−55
24−27
medium / 1080p
27−30
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
50−55
medium / 768p
70−75
45−50
high / 1080p
27−30
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
6−7
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
9−10
4−5
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
12−14
medium / 1080p
12−14
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
110−120
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
100−110
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−110
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
12−14
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
50−55
24−27
medium / 768p
30−35
16−18
high / 1080p
18−20
9−10
ultra / 1080p
10−11
6−7
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 84% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
30−35
18−20
high / 768p
50−55
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
GF100
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
31 May 2010
3 January 2017
Pipelines
352
48
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
52.80
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price
