GeForce GTX 850A vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Plus Graphics 640, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 850A stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 640, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 850A
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 850A has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GeForce GTX 850A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 30 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 602 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GeForce GTX 850A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GM107 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon HD 7670A
- GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce 840M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon HD 7670A
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce 840M
- GeForce GTX 850A vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M