GRID K160Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

When comparing GRID K160Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K160Q

Iris Plus Graphics 640 Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:

Iris Plus Graphics 640 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	32 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K160Q has 766% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 31 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	6−7
ultra / 1080p	0−1	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	16−18
medium / 1080p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	24−27
medium / 1080p	2−3	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	100−110	130−140
medium / 768p	75−80	110−120
ultra / 1080p	30−35	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	9−10	27−30
high / 768p	50−55	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	65−70	80−85
medium / 768p	35−40	55−60
ultra / 1080p	14−16	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 42% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	6−7	18−20
medium / 1080p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	40−45	60−65
medium / 1080p	3−4	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 82% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	10−12	24−27
medium / 1080p	3−4	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 185% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	50−55
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	4−5
ultra / 1080p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	6−7
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
high / 1080p	50−55	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1200% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	24−27
medium / 768p	−	16−18
high / 1080p	2−3	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 466% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	85−90
medium / 768p	30−35	45−50
ultra / 1080p	10−11	18−20
high / 768p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 38% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name	GK107	Kaby Lake GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	3 January 2017
Pipelines	192	48
Core clock speed	850 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1050 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	52.80
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares