GRID K240Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K240Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K240Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GRID K240Q

Iris Plus Graphics 640 Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:

Iris Plus Graphics 640 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K240Q	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	32 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K240Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 31 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	6−7
ultra / 1080p	6−7	4−5
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	16−18
medium / 1080p	12−14	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	16−18	12−14
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K240Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	170−180	130−140
medium / 768p	140−150	110−120
ultra / 1080p	75−80	50−55
QHD / 1440p	40−45	27−30
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	110−120	80−85
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	95−100	80−85
medium / 768p	75−80	55−60
ultra / 1080p	45−50	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	12−14	8−9
ultra / 1080p	10−12	7−8
4K / 2160p	4−5	3−4
low / 720p	27−30	18−20
medium / 1080p	12−14	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	18−20	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−11
low / 720p	75−80	60−65
medium / 1080p	35−40	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 37% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	18−20	12−14
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−12
QHD / 1440p	4−5	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	24−27
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	65−70	50−55
medium / 768p	60−65	45−50
high / 1080p	20−22	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	7−8	4−5
ultra / 1080p	5−6	3−4
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	12−14
medium / 1080p	9−10	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	90−95	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−105	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	35−40	24−27
medium / 768p	24−27	16−18
high / 1080p	12−14	9−10
ultra / 1080p	8−9	6−7
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	50−55	45−50
ultra / 1080p	27−30	18−20
high / 768p	45−50	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.

Full Specs

	GRID K240Q	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name	GK104	Kaby Lake GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	3 January 2017
Pipelines	1536	48
Core clock speed	745 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1050 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	52.80
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K240Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares