GRID K520 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
When choosing between GRID K520 and Iris Plus Graphics 640, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GRID K520
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K520 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 96% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GK104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |