GRID M10 8Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
When choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GRID M10 8Q
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 24 GB more memory, than GRID M10 8Q.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 733 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 62% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 69% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GM107 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 950M
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 850M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 950M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 850M
- GRID M10 8Q vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M