Iris Graphics 5100 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 5100 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 5100 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 640 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Graphics 5100 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 or Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 5100
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
System Shared
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Graphics 5100 has 100% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of Iris Plus Graphics 640 is 100 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
6−7
ultra / 1080p
1−2
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
16−18
medium / 1080p
5−6
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
7−8
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
8−9
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Graphics 5100 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
130−140
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
24−27
27−30
4K / 2160p
18−20
27−30
high / 768p
70−75
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
75−80
80−85
medium / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
4−5
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
7−8
4K / 2160p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
18−20
medium / 1080p
5−6
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
10−12
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 22% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
7−8
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
4−5
1−2
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
20−22
24−27
medium / 1080p
9−10
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
medium / 768p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
3−4
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
2−3
4−5
ultra / 1080p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
12−14
medium / 1080p
4−5
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
high / 1080p
80−85
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
12−14
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
12−14
24−27
medium / 768p
10−11
16−18
high / 1080p
5−6
9−10
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 85% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
medium / 768p
40−45
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
high / 768p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Iris Graphics 5100.
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 5100
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
Haswell GT3
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
5 June 2013
3 January 2017
Pipelines
40
48
Core clock speed
200 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
1,300 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
48.00
52.80
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
64/128 Bit
Shared memory
+
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.103
Quick Sync
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
