Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro 2000D
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro 2000D, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 640 stacks up against Quadro 2000D, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 2000D
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Quadro 2000D | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 62 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 313% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 31 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 42% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Quadro 2000D | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Fermi |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF106 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 5 October 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 20.00 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Quadro 2000D vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Quadro 2000D vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs HD Graphics 530
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro 2000D vs HD Graphics 530
- Quadro 2000D vs GeForce 830M