Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro 2000M
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro 2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro 2000M.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro 2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro 2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 or Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro 2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 2000M has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 30 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 2000M is 250 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
1−2
medium / 1080p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
110−120
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
7−8
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
80−85
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
10−11
ultra / 1080p
30−35
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
8−9
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
0−1
low / 768p
50−55
18−20
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
4−5
−
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
high / 1080p
90−95
27−30
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
30−35
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 768p
24−27
0−1
medium / 768p
16−18
−
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
high / 768p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro 2000M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Fermi
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
22 February 2011
Pipelines
48
192
Core clock speed
300 MHz
550 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
17.60
Floating-point performance
422.4 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.103
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
