Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro FX 3800

    In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro FX 3800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 640 will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 3800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Iris Plus Graphics 640 Check Price
    Quadro FX 3800

    Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:

    Iris Plus Graphics 640 Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 640 Quadro FX 3800
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 108 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
    Memory type DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 GDDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 1 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
      Check Price
    • Quadro FX 3800 has 620% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 31 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 6−7 0−1
    ultra / 1080p 4−5 0−1
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 16−18 10−11
    medium / 1080p 8−9 1−2
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

    Full Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 640 Quadro FX 3800
    Architecture Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake Tesla 2.0
    Code name Kaby Lake GT3e GT200B
    Type Laptop Workstation
    Release date 3 January 2017 30 March 2009
    Pipelines 48 192
    Core clock speed 300 MHz 600 MHz
    Boost Clock 1050 MHz
    Transistor count 189 million 1,400 million
    Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 55 nm
    Texture fill rate 52.80 38.40
    Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops
    Length 198 mm
    Memory bus width 64/128 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1600 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
    Shared memory +
    DirectX 12 (12_1) 11.1 (10_0)
    Shader Model 6.4 4.0
    OpenGL 4.6 3.3
    OpenCL 2.1 1.1
    Vulkan 1.1.103 N/A
    CUDA 1.3
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price

    Similar compares