Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K2200M
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K2200M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 333% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 30 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 367 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 78% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 169% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 130% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Maxwell |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Quadro K2200M vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Quadro K2200M vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs FirePro S9050
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GRID M60 8Q
- Quadro K2200M vs FirePro S9050
- Quadro K2200M vs GRID M60 8Q