Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K4200
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K4200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K4200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
108 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4200 has 620% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than Quadro K4200.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K4200 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 471 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 188% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
30−33
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
24−27
70−75
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 193% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
130−140
230−240
medium / 768p
110−120
200−210
ultra / 1080p
50−55
120−130
QHD / 1440p
27−30
100−105
4K / 2160p
27−30
55−60
high / 768p
80−85
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−35
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
3−4
8−9
low / 720p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 222% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
60−65
130−140
medium / 1080p
21−24
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 155% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
27−30
QHD / 1440p
1−2
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
50−55
100−110
medium / 768p
45−50
95−100
high / 1080p
12−14
40−45
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
4−5
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
6−7
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
24−27
80−85
medium / 768p
16−18
50−55
high / 1080p
9−10
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 184% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro K4200
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Kepler
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GK104
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
22 July 2014
Pipelines
48
1344
Core clock speed
300 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
784 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
87.81
Floating-point performance
2,107 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
172.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
119 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
