Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K5000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K5000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 640 stacks up against Quadro K5000M, check out specs charts below.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K5000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K5000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 or Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro K5000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K5000M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than Quadro K5000M.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K5000M is 406 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K5000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
12−14
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
210−220
medium / 768p
110−120
180−190
ultra / 1080p
50−55
100−110
QHD / 1440p
27−30
55−60
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
80−85
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
95−100
ultra / 1080p
30−35
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
8−9
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
60−65
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 92% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
80−85
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−11
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
6−7
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
24−27
55−60
medium / 768p
16−18
35−40
high / 1080p
9−10
20−22
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−12
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 107% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro K5000M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Kepler
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
N14E-Q5
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
1 June 2012
Pipelines
48
1344
Core clock speed
300 MHz
706 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
67.31
Floating-point performance
1,615 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
51 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
