Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro M2000
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro M2000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro M2000.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M2000 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M2000 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 496 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 177% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−11
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
130−140
230−240
medium / 768p
110−120
200−210
ultra / 1080p
50−55
120−130
QHD / 1440p
27−30
90−95
4K / 2160p
27−30
50−55
high / 768p
80−85
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 82% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
8−9
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
8−9
low / 720p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
14−16
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
60−65
120−130
medium / 1080p
21−24
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
27−30
QHD / 1440p
1−2
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
50−55
100−110
medium / 768p
45−50
95−100
high / 1080p
12−14
40−45
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 124% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
4−5
12−14
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
6−7
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
24−27
75−80
medium / 768p
16−18
45−50
high / 1080p
9−10
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 161% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro M2000
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GM206
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
8 April 2016
Pipelines
48
768
Core clock speed
300 MHz
796 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1163 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
55.82
Floating-point performance
1,812 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6612 MHz
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Shader Model
6.4
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
+
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
215 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
