Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro M2000M
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 640 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro M2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro M2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 or Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro M2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M2000M has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 738 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
130−140
220−230
medium / 768p
110−120
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
110−120
QHD / 1440p
27−30
70−75
4K / 2160p
27−30
40−45
high / 768p
80−85
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 73% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
110−120
medium / 1080p
21−24
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 114% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−12
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 153% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
50−55
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
85−90
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
24−27
65−70
medium / 768p
16−18
40−45
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro M2000M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Maxwell
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GM107
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
2 October 2015
Pipelines
48
640
Core clock speed
300 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1197 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
43.92
Floating-point performance
1,405 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Shader Model
6.4
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
173 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
