Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro M5000M
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro M5000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro M5000M.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro M5000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro M5000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 or Quadro M5000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro M5000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M5000M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M5000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 24 GB more memory, than Quadro M5000M.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M5000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro M5000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 662 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M5000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
55−60
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
130−140
250−260
medium / 768p
110−120
220−230
ultra / 1080p
50−55
180−190
QHD / 1440p
27−30
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
80−85
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−35
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Dota 2 is 101% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
8−9
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
18−20
80−85
medium / 1080p
8−9
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
60−65
180−190
medium / 1080p
21−24
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Fortnite is 277% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
1−2
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
50−55
140−150
medium / 768p
45−50
120−130
high / 1080p
12−14
70−75
ultra / 1080p
6−7
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
4−5
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
12−14
65−70
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Minecraft is 36% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
12−14
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
24−27
130−140
medium / 768p
16−18
85−90
high / 1080p
9−10
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
50−55
high / 768p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro M5000M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Maxwell
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GM204
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
2 October 2015
Pipelines
48
1,536
Core clock speed
300 MHz
962 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1051 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
93.60
Floating-point performance
2,995 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Shader Model
6.4
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
366 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price