Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon 520
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon 520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 640 will be the best choice, for others Radeon 520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon 520 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon 520 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 or Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Radeon 520
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
50 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon 520 has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 30 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 730 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon 520 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
1−2
medium / 1080p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
130−140
55−60
medium / 768p
110−120
30−33
ultra / 1080p
50−55
6−7
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
80−85
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than Radeon 520.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
10−11
ultra / 1080p
30−35
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
8−9
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
0−1
low / 768p
50−55
18−20
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
4−5
−
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
high / 1080p
90−95
27−30
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
30−35
10−11
medium / 1080p
18−20
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 150% more, than Radeon 520.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 768p
24−27
0−1
medium / 768p
16−18
−
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
high / 768p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon 520.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Radeon 520
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
GCN 1.0
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Oland
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
3 January 2017
21 March 2017
Pipelines
48
320
Core clock speed
300 MHz
1030 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
20.60
Floating-point performance
659.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth
16 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.0
Shader Model
6.4
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price