Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon HD 4850 X2. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon HD 4850 X2. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 1566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 480 GB more memory, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 22% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | TeraScale |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce 840A
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 295
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce 840A
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 295