Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon Pro 560
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon Pro 560 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 640 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 560 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon Pro 560 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon Pro 560 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 or Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Radeon Pro 560
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 560 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 607 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon Pro 560 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
130−140
220−230
medium / 768p
110−120
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
100−110
QHD / 1440p
27−30
70−75
4K / 2160p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
80−85
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 79% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
110−120
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 111% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−33
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−12
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
50−55
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
85−90
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
24−27
65−70
medium / 768p
16−18
40−45
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Radeon Pro 560
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Polaris
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Polaris 21
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
5 June 2017
Pipelines
48
1024
Core clock speed
300 MHz
907 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
