Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon Pro Vega 16, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 222% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
24−27
75−80
medium / 1080p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 213% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
130−140
240−250
medium / 768p
110−120
210−220
ultra / 1080p
50−55
130−140
QHD / 1440p
27−30
100−110
4K / 2160p
27−30
60−65
high / 768p
80−85
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−35
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
8−9
30−33
ultra / 1080p
7−8
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
3−4
9−10
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 255% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
30−33
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
low / 720p
60−65
130−140
medium / 1080p
21−24
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 162% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
40−45
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−35
QHD / 1440p
1−2
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
24−27
75−80
medium / 1080p
14−16
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 230% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
50−55
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
high / 1080p
12−14
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 148% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 316% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 72% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−12
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
24−27
85−90
medium / 768p
16−18
55−60
high / 1080p
9−10
30−33
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 207% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Vega
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Vega Mobile
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
15 November 2018
Pipelines
48
1024
Core clock speed
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1190 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
76.16
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.4
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.2.131
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
