Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 30 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
8−9
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
140−150
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
50−55
55−60
QHD / 1440p
27−30
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
80−85
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
8−9
9−10
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
low / 720p
60−65
65−70
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
4−5
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
90−95
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
80−85
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 1% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−12
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
24−27
27−30
medium / 768p
16−18
18−20
high / 1080p
9−10
10−11
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
high / 768p
35−40
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Polaris
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
21 March 2018
Pipelines
48
512
Core clock speed
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1219 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
39.01
Floating-point performance
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
48 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
