Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R7 A265
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R7 A265, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R7 A265 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 A265
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 30 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 128% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 55% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 112% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 31% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Radeon R7 A265 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics