Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R7 M350
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R7 M350, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 640 stacks up against Radeon R7 M350, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M350
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M350 has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 35% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 70% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Radeon R7 M350 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Radeon R7 M350 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce 920MX
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs HD Graphics 5300
- Radeon R7 M350 vs GeForce 920MX
- Radeon R7 M350 vs HD Graphics 5300