Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R9 M360
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 640 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M360
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M360.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M360 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Fortnite is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Radeon R9 M360 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Radeon R9 M360 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R7 M465X
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon HD 7750
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon R7 M465X
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon HD 7750