Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R9 M375X
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M375X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M375X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M375X
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R9 M375X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M375X.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 625 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M375X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Dota 2 is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Fortnite is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1015 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 40.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Radeon R9 M375X vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Radeon R9 M375X vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Radeon HD 5850
- Radeon R9 M375X vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI