Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 26 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Fermi |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Tesla M2070 Q vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X