Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Tesla M6
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Tesla M6. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Tesla M6. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M6
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 24 GB more memory, than Tesla M6.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 630 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 388% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 466% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 307% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 430% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 583% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 340% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 415% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 37% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Tesla M6 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Tesla M6 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Tesla M6 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Tesla M6 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100