FirePro M4000 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
When comparing FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 645, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 or Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M4000 has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
4−5
ultra / 1080p
4−5
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
12−14
medium / 1080p
9−10
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
16−18
medium / 1080p
14−16
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
100−110
medium / 768p
120−130
80−85
ultra / 1080p
55−60
35−40
QHD / 1440p
30−35
24−27
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
90−95
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
85−90
65−70
medium / 768p
65−70
45−50
ultra / 1080p
35−40
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 42% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
9−10
5−6
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
4K / 2160p
4−5
3−4
low / 720p
21−24
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−11
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−12
8−9
low / 720p
65−70
45−50
medium / 1080p
27−30
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
14−16
8−9
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
16−18
medium / 1080p
16−18
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 81% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
40−45
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
high / 1080p
14−16
7−8
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
3−4
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
7−8
medium / 1080p
7−8
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
high / 1080p
90−95
80−85
ultra / 1080p
80−85
70−75
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
7−8
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 57% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
27−30
16−18
medium / 768p
18−20
12−14
high / 1080p
10−11
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
85−90
80−85
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
high / 768p
35−40
30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Full Specs
FirePro M4000
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Architecture
GCN
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Code name
Cape Verde GLM
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 July 2012
10 July 2019
Pipelines
512
48
Core clock speed
600 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
50.40
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.103
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
MXM-A
StereoOutput3D
+
Check Price
Check Price