FirePro S9000 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 2233% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 220% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 155% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 410% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 609% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | Tahiti | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M295X
- FirePro S9000 vs P106 100
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M295X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs P106 100
- FirePro S9000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X