FirePro W4190M vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W4190M and Iris Plus Graphics 645, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W4190M stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 645, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W4190M and Iris Plus Graphics 645 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W4190M and Iris Plus Graphics 645 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M or Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
4−5
ultra / 1080p
1−2
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
5−6
FirePro W4190M and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
8−9
FirePro W4190M and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
120−130
100−110
medium / 768p
95−100
80−85
ultra / 1080p
45−50
35−40
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
high / 768p
70−75
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
12−14
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
75−80
65−70
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
3−4
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
16−18
medium / 1080p
9−10
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
45−50
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
8−9
7−8
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
2−3
3−4
ultra / 1080p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
7−8
medium / 1080p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
65−70
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
16−18
16−18
medium / 768p
12−14
12−14
high / 1080p
6−7
6−7
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
FirePro W4190M and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p
70−75
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
high / 768p
30−35
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Architecture
GCN
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Code name
Mars XTX?
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
12 November 2015
10 July 2019
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
825 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1150 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
50.40
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.103
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price
