FireStream 9270 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 966% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 450 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FireStream 9270 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | RV770 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 930MX
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro V5900
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce 930MX
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs FirePro V5900
- FireStream 9270 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- FireStream 9270 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X