GeForce 820A vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
In this comparison between GeForce 820A and Iris Plus Graphics 645 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 820A will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 820A
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 15 Watt.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 475 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Dota 2 is 96% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 60% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | GF117 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 820A vs Radeon HD 7730M
- GeForce 820A vs Quadro 500M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon HD 7730M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro 500M
- GeForce 820A vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- GeForce 820A vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X