GeForce 825M vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
When choosing between GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics 645, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics 645.
GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics 645 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics 645 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M or Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce 825M has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
2−3
12−14
medium / 1080p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than GeForce 825M.
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
55−60
100−110
medium / 768p
30−33
80−85
ultra / 1080p
6−7
35−40
QHD / 1440p
−
24−27
high / 768p
18−20
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
medium / 768p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Dota 2 is 58% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
12−14
medium / 1080p
−
5−6
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
0−1
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
0−1
9−10
low / 768p
18−20
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
0−1
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
3−4
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
7−8
medium / 1080p
−
4−5
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
high / 1080p
60−65
80−85
ultra / 1080p
50−55
70−75
medium / 1080p
75−80
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
10−11
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−11
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than GeForce 825M.
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
7−8
low / 768p
0−1
16−18
medium / 768p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
14−16
high / 768p
12−14
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce 825M.
Full Specs
GeForce 825M
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Code name
GK208
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
27 January 2014
10 July 2019
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
850 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
1150 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
30.11
50.40
Floating-point performance
722.7 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.103
CUDA
+
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price