GeForce 8800 GTX vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 8800 GTX and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 8800 GTX and Iris Plus Graphics 645. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 8800 GTX
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 8800 GTX has 933% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 8800 GTX is 276 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Dota 2 is 96% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 60% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | Tesla | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | G80 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 November 2006 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 128 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 681 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops | |
Length | 270 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
SLI options | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon HD 8730M
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs GeForce GT 640M LE
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon HD 8730M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce GT 640M LE
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- GeForce 8800 GTX vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X