GeForce 920M vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
In this comparison between GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics 645 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920M will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics 645 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 920M and Iris Plus Graphics 645 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M or Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920M
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce 920M has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 654 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
GeForce 920M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
12−14
medium / 1080p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 920M.
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
60−65
100−110
medium / 768p
27−30
80−85
ultra / 1080p
7−8
35−40
QHD / 1440p
−
24−27
high / 768p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than GeForce 920M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
45−50
65−70
medium / 768p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Dota 2 is 96% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
12−14
medium / 1080p
−
5−6
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
0−1
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
0−1
9−10
low / 768p
18−20
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
0−1
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
3−4
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
7−8
medium / 1080p
−
4−5
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 60% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 920M.
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
7−8
low / 768p
0−1
16−18
medium / 768p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
14−16
high / 768p
12−14
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce 920M.
Full Specs
GeForce 920M
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Code name
N16V-GM-S
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
27 January 2015
10 July 2019
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
954 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
30.53
50.40
Floating-point performance
297.6 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.103
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
40 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
Check Price
Check Price