GeForce GT 740A vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 740A and Iris Plus Graphics 645, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 740A stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 645, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GT 740A
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 740A | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 740A has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce GT 740A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GT 740A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 740A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 740A is 680 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce GT 740A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 740A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 740A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Dota 2 is 96% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 60% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce GT 740A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 740A | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | GK208 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 August 2013 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.5 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 740A vs Radeon HD 6550A
- GeForce GT 740A vs Radeon HD 7730M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon HD 6550A
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon HD 7730M
- GeForce GT 740A vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- GeForce GT 740A vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X