GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Plus Graphics 645, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 645, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 1000 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 70% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | GF104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 288 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X