GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 966% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 479 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 116% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 75% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | GF114 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 336 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X