GRID K240Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 645

When choosing between GRID K240Q and Iris Plus Graphics 645, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K240Q and Iris Plus Graphics 645.

GRID K240Q

Iris Plus Graphics 645 Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:

Iris Plus Graphics 645 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K240Q	Iris Plus Graphics 645
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K240Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	4−5
ultra / 1080p	6−7	2−3
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	16−18
medium / 1080p	18−20	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K240Q and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	170−180	100−110
medium / 768p	140−150	80−85
ultra / 1080p	75−80	35−40
QHD / 1440p	40−45	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	110−120	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 79% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	95−100	65−70
medium / 768p	75−80	45−50
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	12−14	5−6
ultra / 1080p	10−12	5−6
4K / 2160p	4−5	3−4
low / 720p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	18−20	12−14
ultra / 1080p	14−16	8−9
low / 720p	75−80	45−50
medium / 1080p	35−40	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 85% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	18−20	8−9
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	16−18
medium / 1080p	21−24	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 136% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	65−70	40−45
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
high / 1080p	20−22	7−8
ultra / 1080p	9−10	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	7−8	3−4
ultra / 1080p	5−6	2−3
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	7−8
medium / 1080p	9−10	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	90−95	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−105	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	24−27
medium / 1080p	20−22	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	7−8
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	35−40	16−18
medium / 768p	24−27	12−14
high / 1080p	12−14	6−7
ultra / 1080p	8−9	5−6
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 110% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	90−95	80−85
medium / 768p	50−55	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	14−16
high / 768p	45−50	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.

Full Specs

	GRID K240Q	Iris Plus Graphics 645
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Code name	GK104	Kaby Lake GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	10 July 2019
Pipelines	1536	48
Core clock speed	745 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	50.40
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K240Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 645

Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares