GRID M60 2Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M60 2Q and Iris Plus Graphics 645, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M60 2Q stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 645, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 2Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 257 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 220% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 155% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 410% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 609% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | GM204 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M60 2Q vs GeForce GTX 670
- GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon HD 7970
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce GTX 670
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon HD 7970
- GRID M60 2Q vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X